{"id":195,"date":"2023-12-21T15:21:50","date_gmt":"2023-12-21T15:21:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nua-ux.design\/mara-wall\/blog\/?p=195"},"modified":"2024-02-18T15:02:03","modified_gmt":"2024-02-18T15:02:03","slug":"now-thats-what-we-call-growth","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nua-ux.design\/mara-wall\/blog\/uncategorized\/now-thats-what-we-call-growth\/","title":{"rendered":"Now that&#8217;s what we call &#8220;growth&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Back in Design for Publishing (oh, how far away two months ago feels) I had a conversation with a peer around scrapping work. They were hesitant to go away from an idea, despite the fact that multiple peers (and our tutor) hinted that a new direction might serve the idea better. My weigh in was (and is) this: it can feel insanely difficult to let go of an idea you&#8217;ve worked on, because you&#8217;ve worked on it. You put time into to. This definitely applies to more than just ideas: ever think of a relationship, diet, or job you&#8217;ve stuck with just because you&#8217;ve put time into it? We feel that once we&#8217;ve invested time, we can&#8217;t turn elsewhere, pick up something new, or go in a different direction because it invalidates the effort we put forth in the pursuit. It signals to us that we were wrong; yet, often we weren&#8217;t wrong, but new circumstances, context or information arose that made us consider otherwise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>People generally have a fear of starting new. To be fair, it is pretty scary. You wonder if you&#8217;re good enough for what you&#8217;re doing in the first place. You think that maybe if you just put a little more work, effort or time into something it could morph and become exactly the right fit. You&#8217;ve invested in something. This might all sound a bit exaggerated, but harken back to a time where you had to shift and think about the gut reactions and emotions it brought up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Chatting with my peer, it was far easier for me to dispense advice than it is for them to take it. They have a lot more mental hoops to jump through if they decide to go a new direction; I&#8217;m just there blabbing based on what I have noticed in the past for me and that seems applicable for them. So, fast forward to coffee yesterday with a previous team member (from Sync the City). I started explaining my current project 4, a dating app based on sustainability. His exact words, when I brought up explaining my project, were: &#8220;Sell me the idea. Sell me the app.&#8221; I ran through a pitch of what the app was, how it was unique, and the problems it addressed. Lucky for me, he was impressed. But what he said in response threw me off a bit: &#8220;I think that is really fascinating. I haven&#8217;t heard of something like it, but it makes sense. I just think that the dating app isn&#8217;t the correct framework for it.&#8221; <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The dating app not the correct framework?! That was the basis of the project! Now of course, I can take what he said with a grain of salt and go forward. But something about that comment burrowed in my brain. What was another framework that would fit what I&#8217;m trying to achieve? What am I trying to achieve?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I left the coffee not thinking much more about it &#8211; our conversation had drifted elsewhere to winter plans, upcoming events and everything not project related. I had a user interview that evening to further investigate sustainability and dating. This particular person had dating apps in the past, but was particularly wary of the safety questions they pose: how do I know the person I&#8217;m connecting with is authentic?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Fast forward to my yoga practice this morning, and the thought returns: what am I trying to achieve? Thoughts around my project popped up; I realised that from the beginning, when I had other ideas of environmental intersectionality, legislative action, or blurring out businesses that supported deforestation, all of them had something in common: action from a community perspective. One lone call to the legislative body isn&#8217;t enough; it has to be a part of a larger movement. Environmental intersectionality is literally about the intermingling of various justice communities aimed at crafting a better earth\/environment\/place for marginalised communities. Blurring out businesses helped support communities affected by deforestation and the larger eco-system by hitting a large company in the wallet. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But what about my dating app? Isn&#8217;t that addressing community and sustainability? Giving it another thought, I recognise that the dating aspect is more individualistic. I could go into depth here analysing why it might not be the right fit, like my friend had posed at coffee. But something I lean into is following where intuition leads (then backing it up with researching, refine and repeating, no worries! We are in UX here!). <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>What I needed to do was take a step back and ask if I was creating the right solution for the problem I am addressing. What I also needed to do was take myself out of the picture: I&#8217;m not here to make an app that I find fun and flirty. What I&#8217;m here to do is find a problem and match it with the best solution. It takes a lot of ego removal from the process to admit that your first idea might not be the best suited. It also takes courage to go in that new direction. I was harkened back to my advice giving to my former peer and now gave the same advice to myself. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>One bit of my project that stuck out was the deed feed: it brought community together, showcasing sustainable activities, and connecting people with others who were completing deeds they found compelling. That&#8217;s the pivot. Away from dating, back to community. An app that focuses on bringing likeminded sustainable people together: a place to share deeds you have done (insert social validation here), organize events, communicate within a working sustainability group or connect with new people\/groups to form something new. Why not?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Now that&#8217;s what I call growth: learning to let go of an idea when it no longer rightly serves what you&#8217;re going for. Being open to shifting paths, be it big or small. Taking your own advice.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Back in Design for Publishing (oh, how far away two months ago feels) I had a conversation with a peer around scrapping work. They were hesitant to go away from an idea, despite the fact that multiple peers (and our tutor) hinted that a new direction might serve the idea better. My weigh in was [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nua-ux.design\/mara-wall\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nua-ux.design\/mara-wall\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nua-ux.design\/mara-wall\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nua-ux.design\/mara-wall\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nua-ux.design\/mara-wall\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=195"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nua-ux.design\/mara-wall\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":196,"href":"https:\/\/www.nua-ux.design\/mara-wall\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195\/revisions\/196"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nua-ux.design\/mara-wall\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=195"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nua-ux.design\/mara-wall\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=195"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nua-ux.design\/mara-wall\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=195"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}